Seattle Neurology
  • Home
  • Blog
  • EBook
    • Migraine
    • Polyneuropathy
    • Low Back Pain
  • Resources
    • Conditions >
      • Aphasia
      • Brain Trauma
      • Brain Tumor
      • Dementia >
        • Alzheimer's Disease
        • Frontotemporal Dementia
        • Vascular Dementia
      • Diabetes
      • Dystonia
      • Epilepsy
      • Headaches
      • Hearing Loss
      • Low Back Pain
      • Multiple Sclerosis
      • Parkinson's Disease
      • Polyneuropathy
      • Postural Tremor
      • Sleep Disorder
      • Stroke
      • Vision Impairment
    • Geriatric Issues >
      • Agencies
      • Caregiving
      • End of Life
      • Independent Living Facility
      • Medical Supplies
      • Social Services
    • Other >
      • Disability
      • General Health
      • Pharmaceuticals
      • Rehabilitation

NATIONALIZED HEALTHCARE

8/6/2012

0 Comments

 
We need one of the following two options for nationalized health care …

a) Two Tier System

- The government provides catastrophic insurance for EVERYBODY.  This would cover minimum health coverage such as basic primary care.  ED visits would have hefty copays to discourage overuse.

-  Voluntary insurance would exist for those who wanted to have protection against fee-for-service (outpatient) office costs.  The rest of people would have to pay cash.

b) Insurance Mandate

- EVERYBODY must purchase insurance.  No insurance company can reject an applicant – although the rates could be quite high depending on their medical history.  There would be both private and government-sponsored insurance plans available.
I am against a government run Single-Payer health care system.  Currently, we have two federal Single-Payer health care programs (VA, Medicare) and one state-run health care program (Medicaid) to critique.  There are many counties that also offer health-care programs as well.  If we focus a critique on Medicare, we will quickly see the problems with having a Federal Single-Payer health care system.  The Medicare Board of Trustees estimates that within 10 years there will not be enough money within their coffers to cover all the medical costs for those over age 65.  Medicare represents 14% of the entire federal budget.  The US government has been unable to reign in the costs ever since its inception.  From my perspective as a US physician, it seems the government has been trying to develop a system to force hospitals and doctors to provide feedback to the government.  This will allow the government to monitor how the money is being spent (or misspent).  In theory, this should reduce waste.  Unfortunately, what I envision is a lot of administrators and auditors.  This will lead to more wasted time and money for hospitals and doctor’s offices as they continue trying to adjust and accommodate to the whims of these auditors.  If a hospital or doctor does not do it the way – as interpreted by a particular auditor then they do not get paid – ever.  This becomes Socialized medicine (think USSR).

I am against the voucher program proposed by Romney-Ryan.  The voucher system is far too complicated.  We need a nationalized health care program.   I think Medicare can remain financially viable if real cost-saving measures are enacted.  I envision a continuation of Medicare for those over age 65.  Medicare should be able to negotiate lower costs on pharmaceuticals – just as the VA does.  The government will need to establish and enforce ‘best-practices’ protocols.  These would prevent many expensive tests and procedures from being performed until certain criteria had been met.  The US population will have to become comfortable with the concept of rationing – not every procedure can be covered.   Quite likely, the very wealthy will purchase ‘supplemental Medicare insurance’ which will allow them to have carte blanche while the remainder of the elderly have good healthcare.  Basically, a two-tier system will be in place – even after age 65.

The benefit for establishing nationalized health care is that it frees small and large businesses of the obligation of providing costly healthcare to their employees.  Employees no longer have to remain at jobs they despise – simply to keep health insurance.  Hospitals no longer will be forced to provide emergency care for free simply because a person arrives in their hospital.  Currently, hospitals argue that their charges are so high for those with insurance so that they can shift the coverage for these patients who arrive in the ED without any insurance.  With a nationalized health care plan, hospitals should be able to drop their inflated charges and everything will become more transparent.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Body Systems
    Book Review
    Case Study
    Dementia
    Diagnosis
    Elderly
    General Health
    Healthcare
    Helpful Tips
    Mental Health
    Migraines
    Parkinson's

    Archives

    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    October 2011
    September 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.